There was NO Benefit with the Use of Diethylstilbestrol in preventing Miscarriages

More the opposite: DES-exposure in utero led to increased rate of miscarriage and preterm birth

Abstract

image of snake-oil-reps
Diethylstilbestrol usage is now obsolete in modern obstetrics practice. The review is historical to buttress the need for adequate and rigorous research into the use of drugs in pregnancy and ensure that they do more good than harm before being introduced for consumption.

Oestrogen supplementation, mainly diethylstilbestrol, for preventing miscarriages and other adverse pregnancy outcomes

BACKGROUND:
Laboratory evidence in the 1940s demonstrated a positive role of placental hormones in the continuation of pregnancy. It was suggested that diethylstilbestrol (DES) was the oestrogen of choice for prevention of miscarriages. Observational studies were carried out with apparently positive results, on which clinical practice was based. This led to a worldwide usage of diethylstilbestrol despite controlled studies with contrary findings.

OBJECTIVES:
To determine the effects of antenatal administration of oestrogens, mainly diethylstilbestrol, on high risk and unselected pregnancy as regards miscarriages and other outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY:
We searched the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Specialised Register of controlled trials in November 2002.

SELECTION CRITERIA:
Randomised and quasi-randomised trials were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
Both reviewers extracted data from the studies identified that met the selection criteria, and the data were analysed using the RevMan software.

MAIN RESULTS:
Miscarriage, preterm labour, low birthweight and stillbirth or neonatal death were not positively influenced by the intervention (diethylstilbestrol) as compared to the control group. Diethylstilbestrol in utero exposure led to increased rate of miscarriage and preterm birth. There was also an increase in the numbers of babies weighing less than 2500 grams. The maternal outcome in terms of pre-eclampsia was not influenced. Exposed female offsprings have a non-significant trend towards more cancer of the genital tract and cancer other than of the genital tract. Primary infertility, adenosis of the vagina/cervix in female offsprings, and testicular abnormality in male offsprings were significantly higher in those exposed to diethylstilbestrol before birth.

REVIEWER’S CONCLUSIONS:
There was no benefit with the use of diethylstilbestrol in preventing miscarriages. Both short and long-term adverse outcomes in exposed offsprings were demonstration of the harm that this intervention caused women and their offspring during its usage.

Sources
  • NCBI, Oestrogen supplementation, mainly diethylstilbestrol, for preventing miscarriages and other adverse pregnancy outcomes, PMID: 12918007, 2003;(3):CD004353.
  • The Cochrane Library, Full Article, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004353, 21 JUL 2003 – PDF
More DES DiEthylStilbestrol Resources

Author: DES Daughter

Activist, blogger and social media addict committed to shedding light on a global health scandal and dedicated to raise DES awareness.

Have your say! Share your views

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s