Medical research results: why outcome switching matters

Some researchers are doing a bait-and-switch with medical data

Medical research outcome switching is an extremely common problem that distorts the evidence doctors use to make real-world clinical decisions.

These doctors want to fix a huge problem with drug trials. Why isn’t anyone listening?, vox, February 25, 2016.

When studying a drug or device, researchers measure dozens of health outcomes to understand how the new technology works. Before they start a clinical trial, however, they’re supposed to pre-specify which outcomes they really care about on public clinical trials registries… The idea is that researchers won’t later selectively publish the most positive or more favorable outcomes and drop the negative ones.

…In the real world, unfortunately, researchers sometimes cherry-pick results, leaving doctors and patients with a skewed picture of how drugs and devices actually work…

How did NEJM respond when we tried to correct 20 misreported trials?, compare-trials, February 25, 2016.

Author: DES Daughter

Activist, blogger and social media addict committed to shedding light on a global health scandal and dedicated to raise DES awareness.

Have your say! Share your views

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.