Experts fear health timebomb for thousands of hidden victims
Written by Marion Scott, Chief Reporter at Scotland’s national newspaper The Sunday Post, June 20, 2021.
Victims of forced adoption fear generations of their children will suffer because they have no way of knowing if they are at risk of genetic illness.
Experts say the government has a legal responsibility to prevent unnecessary suffering potentially affecting the 60,000 Scottish mothers and the children taken from them because they were not married from the 1950s through the 1970s.
Author Eileen Munro, 53, from Edinburgh, says her shattered childhood, and the effect forced adoption had, led to the death of her own son Craig at the age of 22. …
We have a duty to find a way to repair the damage that was done based simply on the moral judgment of the time, including developing a more transparent system that will allow easier access to medical records. https://t.co/0zcApoCOp9
Adoption UK in Scotland is calling for a formal apology to be made to all women who were historically forced into giving up their babies for adoption. Read our full statement here: https://t.co/32thJA8mBl
Tens of thousands of women in Scotland who were forced to give up their babies for adoption between the 1950s and 70s want a formal apology from the governmenthttps://t.co/Tm5N8w0usgpic.twitter.com/nMTxb9UVir
A quarter of a million unmarried mothers made to give up their babies. Now they, and the children callously wrenched away, want justice. The cruel legacy of forced adoption Don't believe for a minute this is not still happening today! https://t.co/HwA8HI1rL4
I know many of those mums were given DES to suppress their breast milk and very little awareness has been raised on the effect this may have had on them and their future children. I’m hoping to reach out to see if anyone is aware of this, and is willing to share info or an experience so we can shine a light on what was done to so many women and children, and the lasting effect. My email is here and I’d very much like to hear from anyone if they can help give voice to this.
Minister to meet campaigners calling for apology for forced adoption
Written by Marion Scott, Chief Reporter at Scotland’s national newspaper The Sunday Post, June 16, 2021.
Scotland’s new children’s minister has said she will meet with campaigners calling for the Government to apologise to women who were forced to give up their babies for adoption.
Clare Haughey said she was “deeply saddened that in the past ”some mothers had felt “forced to give their children up”.
With campaigners calling on the Government to follow on from the example of countries such as Australia, Canada and Ireland, and apologise for the state’s role in this, Ms Haughey said she would meet members of the Movement for an Adoption Apology …
What Clare Haughey has said in Parliament – Historical Forced Adoption
Chamber meeting date: 16 June 2021
Thank you, Presiding Officer. I welcome you to your new position.
I thank Monica Lennon for bringing forward the debate, and I welcome the opportunity to make some closing remarks. In common with other members we have heard from during the debate, I am deeply saddened that, in the past, women felt forced to give up their children for adoption due to the prevailing moral and social norms of the time. The lives of the women, children and wider families who have been affected by the issue have been profoundly changed by the experience, and I offer my sincere sympathies for what they have endured. I thank the women for their commitment, courage and determination to come forward and have their voices heard. I do not for one minute underestimate how harrowing it is for them to revisit their experiences. Sadly, I am sure that doing so will have added to their pain.
The issue is complex and was influenced by many facets of society at the time. Those of us who have heard first-hand accounts or read research will have been moved, if not shocked, by the often heartbreaking experiences, such as mothers being prevented from seeing their baby during birth and birth mothers feeling pressurised into giving up their child.
The accounts that have been shared today have reiterated the terrible harm and long-lasting impact. The practices might well be historical, but the effect that they have had on the women is very real today. Sadly, we know from the numerous accounts of birth mothers’ experiences that they suffered widespread social censure, condemnation, prejudice and stigma. Thankfully, those practices and morals have no place in our society today.
Two weeks ago, the First Minister agreed to look at the matter properly, fully and quickly, and I am equally committed to doing so. Having reached out to the Movement for an Adoption Apology, I am delighted that it has accepted my invitation to meet next week. I am actively working to establish future meetings with others who have been affected by the historical practices. No voice speaks louder on any issue than the voice of lived experience, and the opportunity to have discussions directly with women who have suffered the trauma of separation and its lifelong effects is of paramount importance to me.
As members will know, I am fairly new to my role as the Minister for Children and Young People. However, I understand that the Movement for an Adoption Apology has campaigned for many years on the issue and has called on the UK Government to issue an apology.
I am acutely aware that the group recently reported that the adoption apology that the Republic of Ireland Government made earlier this year has “not been well received” and has?been “described as ‘political waffle’”. That is why it is so important for me to have direct discussion with those who have lived experience of adoption under these circumstances. It is right that we look at the issue properly, and for me that means listening to the voices of women, children and wider families whose lives have been profoundly changed by the experience. By doing that, we can work in partnership on the next steps.
I certainly give a commitment that I will speak to everyone who wants to raise their voice. We are looking at ways in which we can ensure that we have the widest range of voices to inform us of what the women and their children need and want.
The Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007 requires local authorities to provide those who have been affected by adoption with the support that they require. Adoption support services are available across the country. In certain areas,? that includes specialist agencies such as the Scottish adoption advice service, which is run by Barnardo’s, and Scottish Adoption. Those specialist agencies run extensive and well-established information, intermediary and counselling services, with provision available to local authorities.
The Scottish Government funds and works closely with the organisation Birthlink, which provides services to individuals and families who have been separated by adoption. That includes maintaining the adoption contact register for Scotland. If any women, adoptees or others who have been affected by the issues need support, their first step should be to contact their local authority adoption agency, which will be ready and willing to support anyone in that position.
Although those supports are in place, I recognise that they might not provide everything that those who are campaigning on the issue feel that they need. That is why it is critical for me to understand what really matters to the women and how they feel that they can best be supported, to ensure that they are treated with the sensitivity and respect that they richly deserve.
I will work really hard with the women and their families to find out exactly what they want, because there is no one voice in this. We have one shot at getting this right, so I want to get it right. I give Mr Sarwar a commitment that I will do my level best to assist in making the Parliament’s voice heard. I am mindful that, as Miles Briggs mentioned, the issue has had a huge impact on the children who were separated from their mothers all those years ago, so it is equally important that their voices and experiences are heard, too.?
Given the importance of the issue, I have written to the UK Government to discuss historical adoption practices, as I know that the matter is being discussed south of the border, as members have said.
Major shifts have occurred in adoption practice as well as across society as a whole. However, we are not complacent, and we know that more can be done. That is why, this year, the First Minister committed to implementing the findings of the independent care review’s promise. The promise recommends keeping families together where it is safe to do so, and says that families must be given support so that, together, they can overcome the challenges that are experienced in their lives. Where it is not possible for a child to remain with their birth family, it is crucial that all parties are given the appropriate support, including therapeutic support, as well as support through advocacy and engagement.
I would not want to single out any one of the powerful speeches that we have heard. Members have spoken eloquently about the experience that their constituents have brought to them. I say to every member who has participated that I have certainly heard their words and will take on board their considerations.
I once again reiterate my deepest sympathies to all those who have been affected by historical adoption practices in Scotland. Earlier, I referred to the bravery of the women who have made their voices heard. I am committed to listening to those women, to their children and to others who have been affected, and I am committed to working in partnership with them to explore our next steps.
— Meghan Gallacher MSP (@MGallacherMSP) June 17, 2021
It is long overdue, but now is the time for the Scottish Government to issue a public apology on behalf of the entire nation for the historic injustice of forced adoptions.
It’s hard to find the words to describe the cruelty of historic forced adoption.
Yesterday the @ScotParl debated this lingering injustice. I was humbled to join colleagues in raising the voices of the women and families at the centre of this scandal. #apology
I spoke in the Historical Forced Adoption debate yesterday secured by my colleague @MonicaLennon7 we heard heartbreaking stories of the trauma and grief experienced by so many. It is time for an apology and an inquiry so that better support can be made available for healing👇1/3 pic.twitter.com/f1wgDJwMUJ
Thanks to Monica Lennon for making time in her speech yday to highlight my piece in @FerretScot which found that before survivors of historic forced adoption even entered the room to discuss an apology with the minister in 2015, the SG had already decided it wouldn't be granted. https://t.co/jGIjvr8Hbh
I know many of those mums were given DES to suppress their breast milk and very little awareness has been raised on the effect this may have had on them and their future children. I’m hoping to reach out to see if anyone is aware of this, and is willing to share info or an experience so we can shine a light on what was done to so many women and children, and the lasting effect. My email is here and I’d very much like to hear from anyone if they can help give voice to this.
Psychologist warns of a legacy of pain and a lifetime of heartache
Written by Marion Scott, Chief Reporter at Scotland’s national newspaper The Sunday Post, June 13, 2021.
The trauma endured by young women forced to give up their babies for adoption left a lifelong legacy of anguish, a leading psychologist warns.
Dr Cynthia McVey spent decades supporting the victims of the forced adoption era which saw 60,000 mums bullied into giving up their babies because they were not married.
She is now seeking a meeting with government ministers to find a way forward for the women and the children they were forced to give away after MSPs last week urged Nicola Sturgeon to offer the victims a formal, official apology. The first minister promised to look into the situation. …
since many of those women were given DES to “cope with their condition” – see Marion’s note below.
since DES has many mental health issues reported – see related studies.
then, it is probably reasonable not to exclude a “cocktail effect” – or “domino effect” – and increased mental health issues for those women…
Related Tweets
The Scottish Parliament will debate historical forced adoption this week.
Campaigners seek a formal apology from government. This already happened in Australia in 2013, helping women to heal and access dedicated support for their disenfranchised grief. https://t.co/lD3KjKs22Bhttps://t.co/wGS4UPNHGf
For many women this period in our history destroyed their right to a family life.
We cannot right the wrongs of the past, but the Scottish Government can say sorry and support everyone whose lives have been affected. https://t.co/Tl480udOos
I know many of those mums were given DES to suppress their breast milk and very little awareness has been raised on the effect this may have had on them and their future children. I’m hoping to reach out to see if anyone is aware of this, and is willing to share info or an experience so we can shine a light on what was done to so many women and children, and the lasting effect. My email is here and I’d very much like to hear from anyone if they can help give voice to this.
“We were vulnerable, bullied and told if we loved our babies, we’d give them up.”
Written by Marion Scott, Chief Reporter at Scotland’s national newspaper The Sunday Post, June 6, 2021.
Politicians from every party have backed calls for an official apology to 60,000 mothers who were victims of forced adoption.
The cross-party support means parliament will now debate the scandal when mothers were forced to give their babies up for adoption between the 1950s and 1980s because they were not married.
The practice, which has been described as an abuse of human rights by Amnesty International, has already led to apologies in Australia, Canada and Ireland to the mothers and adopted children, many of whom were never told the truth about their birth or helped to find their natural parents. …
If it had not been for the bravery of Marion telling her heartbreaking story, many people would never have known this dreadful human rights scandal had happened in Scotland.
We can’t right the wrongs of the past, but we can say sorry and support everyone whose life was affected. https://t.co/BGatUaltta
“I remember crying and telling them ‘but I’m his mummy’, and begging them not to take my son. I was told not to be silly. I’d get over it and I could always have other babies when I was married." https://t.co/lejGC387Rbpic.twitter.com/mFZxeIoRQt
I know many of those mums were given DES to suppress their breast milk and very little awareness has been raised on the effect this may have had on them and their future children. I’m hoping to reach out to see if anyone is aware of this, and is willing to share info or an experience so we can shine a light on what was done to so many women and children, and the lasting effect. My email is here and I’d very much like to hear from anyone if they can help give voice to this.
Mum who lost her firstborn to forced adoption begs for a government apology as her dying wish
Written by Marion Scott, Chief Reporter at Scotland’s national newspaper The Sunday Post, May 30, 2021.
A mum who lost her firstborn to forced adoption is using her dying wish to beg for a government apology.
Marion McMillan, 71, has been asking the Scottish Government for six years to make the official apology for the abuses of the past which saw about 60,000 single mums being forced to hand over their babies for adoption.
While the UK Government Human Rights Joint Committee has now agreed to hear the mothers’ stories, campaigners are asking why Scottish ministers find it too hard to say “sorry”. …
Can you imagine any other group of horribly wronged people having an apology denied ‘Sympathy but can’t undo the past.’
Scandalous historical treatment of single mothers in the UK, forced adoption, refusal of pain relief to teach them a lesson. https://t.co/KPoPbAuL0C#JustWomen
— Andrea ‘Tired’ Paterson (@WorldOfOrdinary) May 25, 2021
"I felt so humiliated, no dignity no rights, no anything, and I was 17 – so I just, I just was forced to go along with this practice"
The UK’s 20th century forced adoption scandal was state-sanctioned abusehttps://t.co/a9rq7P391j
What often happens in the family courts to children who have domestically abusive fathers is also state-sanctioned abuse, right now in the 21st century
Grateful to MSPs who have signed my motion on historic forced adoption. It seeks an apology from the UK and Scottish Government, similar to approach taken in Australia which led to dedicated support and counselling.
I know many of those mums were given DES to suppress their breast milk and very little awareness has been raised on the effect this may have had on them and their future children. I’m hoping to reach out to see if anyone is aware of this, and is willing to share info or an experience so we can shine a light on what was done to so many women and children, and the lasting effect. My email is here and I’d very much like to hear from anyone if they can help give voice to this.
Drug firms ‘could shape the profiles of patient organisations through heavy investment’ even if they don’t have a say in their content of campaigns or research
Big pharma poured £57m into UK patient charities which could influence NHS drug decision makers, Bath University researchers’ analysis finds, the independent reports Read University of Bath blog.
Key messages
From 2012 to 2016 the drug industry donated over £57m (€65m; $73m) to UK patient organisations, with the annual sum more than doubling over the period
The funding benefited a small number of organisations and activities related to research and public involvement
The industry gave priority to commercially high profile conditions
Industry payment disclosures had limited transparency
We’ve been banging the drum about transparency of payment to doctors for years – we’ve even put a moratorium on financial conflicts of interest in the authors of any of our education articles. Not because we think that all doctors who receive money from industry are being influenced to push their agenda – but because we have no way of telling when that’s happening…
I can totally believe this!!Which is why many of the big charities don’t support our work and promote what we are doing and just sit on the fence!!! They are funded by Pharma! The best thing we ever did was REFUSING funding to continue being independent https://t.co/WYvsTSsvcY
At the same time, and rightly, patient groups are becoming more involved in setting things like research priorities, and in guideline development – and we’re campaigning to increase that involvement. but as that involvement increases, it’s also important to make sure that potential industry influence is made transparent.
Piotr Ozieranski, is an assistant professor at the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at the University of Bath and one of the authors of a new analysis which attempts to build a picture of industry funding of UK patient groups.
What will be the real cost of “giving women more choices” and messing with their bodies” ?
“The Period Delay Pill has been available on our Online Doctor service previously and now introducing it in our pharmacies and nurse clinics with a consultation and questionnaire allows women to make the choice easily and quickly should they choose to delay their period.”
Asthma; cardiac dysfunction; conditions that may worsen with fluid retention; diabetes (progestogens can decrease glucose tolerance—monitor patient closely); epilepsy; history of depression; hypertension; migraine; susceptibility to thromboembolism (particular caution with high dose).
When used for contraception
Active trophoblastic disease (until return to normal of urine- and plasma-gonadotrophin concentration)—seek specialist advice; arterial disease; functional ovarian cysts; history of jaundice in pregnancy; malabsorption syndromes; past ectopic pregnancy; sex-steroid dependent cancer; systemic lupus erythematosus with positive (or unknown) anti-phospholipid antibodies with intramuscular use for contraception disturbances of lipid metabolism; history during pregnancy of deterioration of otosclerosis; history during pregnancy of pruritus; possible risk of breast cancer.
Cautions, further information
A possible small increase in the risk of breast cancer should be weighed against the benefits.
The product literature advises caution in patients with history of thromboembolism, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and migraine; evidence for caution in these conditions is unsatisfactory.
“Like the contraceptive pill, period delay pills are not side-effect free. Norethisterone is a synthetic version of the naturally occurring hormone progesterone and, like the other synthetic hormones in contraception, it can cause breast tenderness, nausea, headaches, low libido and, crucially, ‘disturbances in mood’. What the NHS likely means by this is mental health side effects which can range from ‘feeling a bit low’ to full-blown depression and anxiety. No two women are the same and so no two women will respond to a pill in the same way.”
Read Why no one’s talking about the worrying side effects of period delay tablets on Metro, 10 Aug 2019.
Of course. Basically norethisterone is a progestagen hormone but womens bodies convert it to oestrogen. So taking norethisterone to delay a period is equivalent to taking a 20mcg combined pill. Women who cant take the combined pill because of migraine, cancer, thrombosis
GIRLS: do those prescription tablets for delaying ur period work ? (Not the pill, it’s called Norethisterone or utovlan). Has anyone ever taken them? Did u experience bad side effects
Microplastics: new methods are needed to filter tiny particles from drinking water, 2019
The presence of plastics in aquatic environments is a growing concern across the EU. This study explored the amount of microplastic particles present in raw and treated water at three water-treatment plants in the Czech Republic. While treated water contained fewer particles than raw1 fresh water, the amount found in treated water was not negligible, and largely comprised tiny particles of <10 micrometres (μm) in diameter. Ways to filter microplastics from potable water must be identified and their risk to humans, sources and routes into drinking water determined, say the researchers, Science for Environment Policyreports.
Highlights
Microplastics were present in all water samples from different treatment plants.
The concentration of microplastics was higher in raw water than in treated water.
Particles of 1–10 μm were the most abundant, accounting for up to 95%.
Polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene and polyethylene microplastics prevailed.
Abstract
The study investigates the content of microplastic particles in freshwater and drinking water. Specifically, three water treatment plants (WTPs) supplied by different kinds of water bodies were selected and their raw and treated water was analysed for microplastics (MPs). Microplastics were found in all water samples and their average abundance ranged from 1473 ± 34 to 3605 ± 497 particles L−1 in raw water and from 338 ± 76 to 628 ± 28 particles L−1 in treated water, depending on the WTP. This study is one of very few that determine microplastics down to the size of 1 μm, while MPs smaller than 10 μm were the most plentiful in both raw and treated water samples, accounting for up to 95%. Further, MPs were divided into three categories according to their shape. Fragments clearly prevailed at two of the WTPs and fibres together with fragments predominated at one case. Despite 12 different materials forming the microplastics being identified, the majority of the MPs (>70%) comprised of PET (polyethylene terephthalate), PP (polypropylene) and PE (polyethylene). This study contributes to fill the knowledge gap in the field of emerging microplastic pollution of drinking water and water sources, which is of concern due to the potential exposure of microplastics to humans.
Marion Scott image courteasy of democratonline, 2020.
